.png)
Post your review of the MFA Thesis Exhibit (Museum of Fine Arts):
In showcasing the culmination of work by five WSU Master of Fine Arts graduate candidates, the 2009 Master of Fine Arts Thesis Exhibition accentuated notion that every artist has a distinctive style and that unique meanings are to be derived from his/her art. Upon entering the gallery, I was exposed to what appeared to be an assortment of unconnected culminations of art. While the pieces of each artist were professionally situated around the room, they were chaotic and inconsistent in meaning, style, and form. The lack of conformity between each artist detracted from being able to derive a meaningful take home message. Relationships between each of five artist’s art were skin-deep at best, in that the only commonality appeared to be that they were all students at Washington State University.
As a student majoring in neuroscience, I have been taught, when locating an unknown structure in my neuro-anatomy lab, to begin by first identifying a familiar area of the brain. I believe the same concept applies to extracting meaning out of art. At the exhibition, the art of each artist appeared to drift into different realm of meaning and representation, making it fitting that each pool of work was isolated to one side of the gallery by empty wall space. In attempting to extract value from the exhibit, I started by identifying pieces of art that I could relate with.
Immediately, the work of Brad Dinsmore resonated with me. On his website he described that his work “creates a context where the mood or general feeling can be understood, but like a memory the more you focus on it or try to understand the specifics, the more elusive it becomes.” His pieces had a consistent theme revolving around the impact that thought and memory have on mood and the execution of emotion.
In Converging Thoughts (included above), Dinsmore uses a combination of scribbles and doodles to represent individual thoughts and memories. Consistent with modern day science which suggests that the creativity is predominated by the right side of the brain, I interpreted the colorful squiggles, above the man’s right hemisphere, to represent creative thought and unrestricted imagination. I perceived the black doodles, above the man’s left hemisphere, to represent comprehendible memories and analytical thought as the outlines of a hand and even a bird could be recognized. In the portrait, it is the confrontation of creative thought and rational memories that create knowledge and emotion. The man’s preponderance of knowledge and emotional content are the consequence of his converging ideas.
My interpretation is further supported in Dinsmore’s Problems of Knowledge, Letting Go, and Learning to See. In Problems of Knowledge, knowledge is again represented by the intertwining of black and colorful squiggles between the hands in the piece. What separates this piece from Converging Thoughts is that the colorful squiggles are only shades of green. I believe that Dinsmore uses specific colors to thoughts that evoke distinct emotions. Although there is no indication of the category of mood in Problems of Knowledge, the title suggests that green may induce a “problematic” emotional state of disorientation and confusion.
The portrait Letting Go, the man has yellow, green, and black forms hovering over his head. He appears to be in a pondering state of confusion and confliction as to how to let go of the knowledge lurking above him. Interestingly, the man appears to be comfortable with his mood, which is suggestive that yellow stimulates a level of satisfaction and content. The piece is consistent with Problems of Knowledge, where I interpreted green to represent an emotional state of confusion. I’d imagine that red would convey an angry emotional state and blue a sad mood if similar paintings of Dinsmore were accessible.
While I did not derive a meaningful take home message from the exhibit as a whole due to its incoherent and distractive nature, I did find the work of Brad Dinsmore to be evocative and significant. Dinsmore’s collection illustrated the physical representation of a manifestation of thoughts. With squiggles, scribbles, and doodles, Dinsmore played with the philosophy that thought is real and that only its physical form is an illusion. Often we as a society fail to recognize the value and shear existence of thoughts in nature because we cannot see them nor are we exposed to the hidden fantasies of others. Dinsmore sheds a beautiful light on thought and its influence on mood, making the viewer more aware that he/she is the one ultimately in control of emotional state in which he/she lives.
Image Above:
Brad Dinsmore
Converging Ideas (2009)
Charcoal and Crayon on paper

